Weir Media


Powered by Rollyo
Training Courses

Profiting from the internet
A vital course if you want to understand how to make money on the internet

Introduction to internet marketing
"Just wanted to drop you a line and thank you for the brilliant Internet Marketing training that I attended.."

Next Generation Magazines
Want to future-proof your magazine? Look no further

Diploma in Digital Publishing
Learn from John Weir and other leading internet thinkers

 

Comment

Diploma In Digital Publishing
"I think the course – thus far – is fantastic! And John is a terrific lecturer! Animated, keeps the complex simple, and has a great sense of humour – really good!"

On circulation
"It is obvious that whatever magazine sector you choose, it is in some sort of decline, whether it be computing, travel or automotive."

Web 2.0 not Business 2.0
The closure of Business 2.0 marks the end of the first phase of the internet

Digital Magazine News
"Digital Magazine News carries an interview with me on the launch of Excite Publishing in the UK"

Archived articles

View John Weir's profile on LinkedIn

 

 

Why web readership differs from print

I've been mulling for some time over the question of how readership of magazines and the net differs, and came across this  from Scott Karp on Publishing 2.0.

Essentially, its a grok on the whole "whyowhy don't we read books anymore" argument, but it has practical lessons for print readership as a whole.   He argues that whereas magazines are read in a linear and predictable fashion, websites are read in a totally different way.

Randomly in fact, as users follow links and pages in a totally haphazard fashion.   He goes on to postulate whether or not this means the whole way we THINK has changed - in a far more unstructured pattern than before - and it is this that is really insightful.

Google, he suggests, thinks as an algorithm does - in a networked fashion rather than just straight lines.   That begs the question ; how do literature students and computer "literati" differ in their reading modes ? And more importantly, what does that portend for the way that we educate specific groups of people in the future ? Education is after all, a linear proposition - primary school, secondary school, university/college...  

Thats a theme picked up by Jeff Jarvis, who talks about "distributed education " ; allowing students to use the internet to take any course they like at any academic institution. He goes further.. "Similarly, why should a professor pick just from the students accepted at his or her school? Online, the best can pick from the best, cutting out the middleman of university admissions. "

And even potentially, allowing students to teach and learn from each other. The true democritisation of education. Even allowing for the downsides of such a model - lack of research and the "Wikipedia" effect (where a minority of members so the majority of editing) this is fascinating stuff.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

The Economy of Abundance

Perhaps the most interesting aspect of the whole "print vs internet" debate is the emergence of new business models. Many of these are being formed out of neccessity rather than design, but whatever the reasons, the outcomes are bound to be fascinating.

One of these is book publishing; most publishers are forced to maintain high cover prices because of the mechanics of the book trade. A £15 book, for instance has to absorb costs of around £9 per copy if you take into account print, paper, the cost of production, and of course wastage/unsolds. And that is before author costs as well.

So the new business model proposed by Chris Anderson (the ex editor of Wired) will be a useful test of whether there is another way of cutting this particular cake.

Anderson is evidently considering offering two versions of his next book (eerily entitled "Free"). Readers will either be able to buy the book for the list price, or download a second version, free of course, but full of advertising.

Anyone care to wager that he earns more from the advertising model than from the hardback ?

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Pope rumoured to be Catholic

The Observer carries a report on teenage magazine buying patterns, with some (un)surprising conclusions. The research, conducted by web research company Tickbox.net (and therefore probably a bit skewed towards online rather than offline consumption) found that UK youngsters say the internet has affected the number of magazines they buy.

When will this news become less surprising ? When publishers start to realise that what they are seeing isn't a temporary fad, but the effects of a covergence culture. Teenagers can multitask a 31 hour day out of just 24 hours, and their prevalence for games consoles, mobile phones and the internet is driving them away from print.

Hats off then to Dennis for sticking with Monkey Magazine when other publishers simply trot out flat online versions of their print magazines. Dennis are learning huge amounts about their users, capturing data and behavioural demographics which will give them a real head start in publishing's next big battle - against highly targeted social networks.

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

 

 

Recent articles